GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: how OpenAI's latest model compares against rivals
Mint published a comparison of OpenAI's recently launched GPT-5.5 against Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro.
At a glance
- Mint reports GPT-5.5, OpenAI's recently launched model, improves on coding and efficiency but trails Claude in precision coding.
VERDICT — CONFIRMED
Mint published a comparison of OpenAI's recently launched GPT-5.5 against Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro, assessing how OpenAI's latest model stacks up against its principal rivals.
Per the report, GPT-5.5 shows improvements in coding and efficiency over its predecessor, but still lags Claude in precision coding — the outlet's shorthand for exacting, correctness-sensitive programming work.
The piece is a third-party press comparison rather than a formal evaluation, and no benchmark scores were available in the material reviewed. How Mint reached its precision-coding conclusion — hands-on testing, vendor materials or synthesis of other coverage — was not specified.
The confirmed facts are the models compared and Mint's published verdict. The relative-performance claims are the outlet's characterization, unverified by quantitative benchmarks in this brief; readers weighing the three models would need published evaluation data that the material reviewed did not contain.
Key facts on file
- Mint reports GPT-5.5, OpenAI's recently launched model, improves on coding and efficiency but trails Claude in precision coding.
